71 Gem Testimonials

Industry
Company Size
15 per page
  • 15
Reset
  • "The collaboration aspect has been huge. The reason we looked for a tool is because we didn’t have any collaboration workflows. People looking to adopt Gem ATS are teams that are looking to grow and will need better collaboration and need to get out of spreadsheets."

  • "Talent acquisition has even more credibility now because recruiters are no longer speaking anecdotally; they’re speaking with data. So they can influence upper management in ways they may not have been able to before.”

  • “When a prospective candidate responds and says they’re not looking right now, I ask if there’s a good timeframe in which to circle back with them. When I hear back I set a reminder for myself to follow up with them at that point. All of that happens right in …

  • "Now that we have top-of-funnel data, we have much better insights into which parts of the funnel to optimize. We can focus on what matters because Gem is in the background, contributing the numbers."

  • “Gem’s color-coding alerts me to who’s waiting on feedback, whom we need to take action on. I see that 5 candidates have made it to the reference check. I see how many days it’s been since our last touchpoint with every candidate. At a glance, I have an immediate sense …

  • “Using Gem's Pipeline Analytics has allowed our teams to be much more data driven in our sourcing techniques. We are able to tell better stories about candidate pass through rates for all of our passive and active candidates using Gem's filters that integrate seamlessly with our ATS.”

  • "I loved how fast and easy it is to sort candidates — I just put in the requirements from the job description right into AI Ranking, and it scored applicants perfectly. I'm really looking forward to continuing to use this to speed up reviews."

  • “The difference between a great sourcer and a sub-par sourcer is in how much discipline someone has in following-up, in not wasting productivity cycles. Response rates on that initial outreach might be 15%, but they might be 50% on the follow-up. So the one thing I was looking for in …

  • “Send-on-behalf-of is a way of leveraging hiring managers’ names and, in some cases, their reputations, to see if we can get more responses; and they don’t have to do any of the work. Then I get to go into Outreach Stats and see: is this a strategy worth replicating? What …

  • “When I came to Pure [Storage] and was shown Gem, I immediately thought, Oh, this is a godsend. I no longer had to send follow-ups manually or keep track of whom to follow up with on my own trackers.”

  • “We’re striving to increase the representation of certain employee populations across teams, roles, and levels. Gem is not only informing those targets; it’s also helping us track how we’re trending in our diversity efforts.”