-
“If we build it we have to test it to make sure it’s doing the right thing. When we conduct backend experiments, we have to know the system will remain reliable. We have to make sure the backend behaves in a way that doesn’t impact the user experience.”
-
"At the point engineers make deployments live, they want to understand how the features are performing, from a customer experience, user value, and system standpoint. We know that one of the big challenges developers face in understanding impact is how to get all of the data in the first place. …
-
"It’s inherently collaborative and transparent, a rigorous and sound process based on the hard data we know about."
-
"The system is very reliable, it has a good number of integrations already in place and works nicely with CDPs. The support team is amazing and they answer questions in a very timely manner. Also very helpful are the governance tools. The python Admin API has also been very helpful …
-
“Split’s Azure DevOps integration has simplified our workflow by allowing our developers to create new flags directly in the boards. The linkage between work items and feature flags is a big plus because it streamlines the process of knowing when all work is completed for a single feature, helping us …
-
"Split's controlled release capability provides us a non-disruptive and dynamic way to ship features for testing and deployment. More importantly, it provides the data we need to quickly iterate on our product features in an informed manner.”
-
"Split is incredibly empowering for product managers. The web console consolidates and provides transparency into every release, while also enabling teams to make changes dynamically without relying on engineering. With Split, engineering and product teams can collaborate to more efficiently to create, manage, and complete rollouts that much faster.”
-
“By decoupling experimentation decision-making from engineering Resources [with Dynamic Configuration], product teams become empowered to make fast and flexible changes to the product with little to no technical knowledge.”
-
"As we improved our checkout process relying on Split to measure the impact of our changes, we saw an overall increase in conversion year over year, and that’s made a huge difference on our bottom line."
-
"Split gives me a lot of confidence in our releases as we are able to customize our rollouts, and even roll back quickly if needed. It also allows us to target certain segments that we’d like to release to prior to others.”
-
“If we built this in-house, most engineers would look at this and say ‘feature rollout, it’s not that hard’. But when you think about having multiple environments, having a UI, conditional filters, an impression data pipeline, all that—it’s a whole team working for a very long time to be able …
-
"Our team uses Split feature flags to deploy quickly and experiment with new ideas. Feature Monitoring gives us a safe way to release features to our global user base with less risk."
-
“We had the intention to change the password field, but we didn’t have a way to know how good it was effectively, and to be able to control it in-house, within our product team. Split allowed us to do all of that and more.”
-
"To balance rapid development with the high availability our customers demand, we needed total control over releasing new functionality. To build and maintain such a system would have taken extensive time and resources. With Split, we're getting the features we need today along with the help of a team of …
-
"Before Split, our feature releases were cumbersome and time-consuming, requiring our product managers to make special requests to developers every time we wanted to launch new functionality."