-
“The thing that’s great about Split is that you can change the behavior of the product outside of a code deployment.”
-
“If we built this in-house, most engineers would look at this and say ‘feature rollout, it’s not that hard’. But when you think about having multiple environments, having a UI, conditional filters, an impression data pipeline, all that—it’s a whole team working for a very long time to be able …
-
"Split's controlled release capability provides us a non-disruptive and dynamic way to ship features for testing and deployment. More importantly, it provides the data we need to quickly iterate on our product features in an informed manner.”
-
“We have in total about 14 teams working on our digital asset management platform. All of the teams are using Split."
-
"Split’s full-stack experimentation platform has been built with engineering and product teams in mind. Its robust architecture and rich feature set integrates into our internal platforms and helps power experimentation across our entire engineering organization."
-
"Thanks to Split, we were able to learn that the risky version actually had the highest adoption by our customers while keeping overall signup conversion steady."
-
“Split has allowed Vida to test our mobile application in a way we wouldn’t be able to do otherwise.”
-
“Split’s Azure DevOps integration has simplified our workflow by allowing our developers to create new flags directly in the boards. The linkage between work items and feature flags is a big plus because it streamlines the process of knowing when all work is completed for a single feature, helping us …
-
"One of our first experiments was a great learning experience. It prevented us from introducing something that we thought was good, but actually would have likely given us a negative impact. We’re now doing another iteration to get it right."
-
"We use feature flags and run experiments a lot more because it’s easier now with Split. We can target a random sample size. We can increment the size of that sample really easily, and we can toggle it off immediately if there’s an issue."
-
"To balance rapid development with the high availability our customers demand, we needed total control over releasing new functionality. To build and maintain such a system would have taken extensive time and resources. With Split, we're getting the features we need today along with the help of a team of …
-
"At the point engineers make deployments live, they want to understand how the features are performing, from a customer experience, user value, and system standpoint. We know that one of the big challenges developers face in understanding impact is how to get all of the data in the first place. …
-
"Split has made us more confident in our release process and also more confident in our data decisions."
-
"It’s powerful to think about all features launched before Split and how many of those must have cost us money that we don’t know about."
-
"Without Split it was hard to time the release of our web app, API, and mobile app – given app store approvals. Now we can group a change behind a feature flag, do a production dry run, and toggle it on for users."