“I have noticed an improvement in our Servers and Lefthand SAN resource utilization with the latest version of Diskeeper. Diskeeper is less resource intensive which can be attributed to IntelliWrite technology. As Diskeeper is the market leader in disk defragmentation and has been independently tested many a time, we have …

“Diskeeper was recommended by our software vendor for his voice recording product. I am responsible for the deployment of Diskeeper in our Voice Logger project for our call centers starting this month. So far the installations of the product were limited to a lab environment. Diskeeper is a very efficient …

“We’ve been running Diskeeper on our production SQL server to keep the physical fragmentation of files to a minimum after we had a problem with severe fragmentation on some of our drives. It’s done a solid job of keeping the system at relatively low fragmentation level with little cost in …

“Condusiv’s V-locity didn’t just double the productivity of our patient care without adding new hardware, it enabled us to save on the bottom line and reclaim a storage budget that had ballooned since we virtualized.”

“When building out my environment I make sure to have fast hard drives, controllers, etc. in order to make sure I do not suffer bottlenecks. I am very careful about not over-committing resources. However, I was shocked to see how much performance increased on the servers I had hosting disk-intensive …

"From super-large volumes, to end user desktops, the degradation in performance was crippling due to the high fragmentation we were experiencing! Diskeeper was our end-to-end solution, with centrally deployed products catering to all our servers, storage solutions and desktops. Solutions including fragmentation prevention on-the-fly with IntelliWrite, to the massive volume …

“Diskeeper has helped us tremendously since implementation. IntelliWrite has saved us the replacement of many hard drives since we have had it running. Great product. We need reliability especially for our server farms. We have always experienced good results with your products.”

“I ran V-locity in my test environment. The Benefit Analyzer showed a 117% performance improvement. With V-locity on board, I just don’t worry about performance.”

“The biggest benefit from Diskeeper is from reduced downtime from HDD failures which in turn saves me money in capital expenditures as I can squeeze more life out of my hardware. By continuously keeping the drives defragged, they don’t have to work as hard when files are accessed, and therefore …

“Mainly we got licenses for large or multi-terabyte servers, because the built-in defrag doesn’t handle that size well. I always suggest Diskeeper for servers with large terabyte server storage. We are running 40 licenses department wide. We run mostly Windows 2003 32 bit, with 10% on 64 bit, some clustered."

“I had two servers that were highly fragmented. One is a file server that has the users My Documents redirected to it and the other is a mail server. I tried the Windows built-in defrag on both servers and had numerous problems. The built-in would literally take days to run …

“We use Diskeeper EnterpriseServer specifically for the Instant Defrag on Windows servers that have files added and deleted throughout the day. We had performance issues on these servers, because of the fragmentation problems. Those issues have now gone away. We had an application that was slowing down over time. The …

“We use Diskeeper extensively to keep our file systems from becoming fragmented and therefore optimize the disk read/write efficiency along with available storage. We primarily use Microsoft SQL database. We use EMC drives at a significant number of our customer sites in both SAN and NAS configurations. In addition we …

"With V-locity we've seen a 157% decrease in I/O to the SAN, but for us it's really about performance. Users are happy, files are processing properly, and work is getting done in a quarter of the time."

"Our common workloads are supported by our older Dell Compellent arrays, but all of our MS-SQL workloads are supported by newer Nimble storage arrays. As great as Nimble performs from a ‘cost per performance’ standpoint, it simply wasn’t enough with the growth of data and users we had been experiencing. …