-
“We are a medium-sized organization with 3 HP G5/G6 Servers running Windows 2003 & Windows 2008; the roles include our Domain Controller, Exchange 2007, and Citrix. We have 45 workstations connected to the Network. Having Diskeeper on our Servers and PCs keeps them working optimally. Without Diskeeper they slow down …
-
“The difference is night and day for both servers and workstations after deploying Diskeeper. Boot time has sped up and users notice the performance difference. Digital dictation and voice-to-text translation software no longer slow down their workstations due to massive amounts of files. We have Diskeeper installed on our servers …
-
"I use the Automatic defrag so use of Diskeeper is very easy. We are seeing very good results and the files are more efficiently organized on the disks than before. We use Diskeeper in a data warehouse environment. It means that every night we delete a lot of datasets and …
-
“We initially deployed Diskeeper when Windows NT4 was new to keep seek times at acceptable levels. IntelliWrite technology has successfully taken a lot of the resource load off of servers with large drive volumes. We are a large Citrix shop and use Diskeeper on our Citrix presentation and backend servers.”
-
“We are running Diskeeper EnterpriseServer on our Domino Lotus Notes application and also on the mail servers. We are running these across several RAID 5 arrays encompassing over 2.75 TB of user data. It used to take us 25 hours to perform our weekly backup of the Domino Servers. By …
-
“The biggest benefit from Diskeeper is from reduced downtime from HDD failures which in turn saves me money in capital expenditures as I can squeeze more life out of my hardware. By continuously keeping the drives defragged, they don’t have to work as hard when files are accessed, and therefore …
-
“V-locity works great. It is easy to install and then it just runs. It keeps my Hyper-V virtual machines from fragmenting and I never have to worry about it. It is true “Set it and Forget it” software."
-
“Our company is better off from using Diskeeper as our servers, computers and gateways see a noticeable difference in file access on the defragged drives. The biggest gains are on systems that do a lot of read/writes and even more if the files are temporary. We have been using Diskeeper …
-
“If a file was 50 pages long, I would sit and watch the page count loading all 50 pages before printing the report. Some of the files we process are more than 500 pages, so I think you can imagine the pain."
-
"Case Management Solutions shared with us the pain they were experiencing and the need to find the most cost-effective solution possible. We quickly spotted some necessary server upgrades, but after having seen what V-locity® I/O reduction software had done for our other clients, we knew that was likely the only …
-
“Automatic defrag is why we purchased Diskeeper. We have an HP MSA1000 2TB SAN and two DELL EqualLogic SANs. When we used the SAN’s for data storage on a file server, we had customers complaining all the time about performance. Once we installed Diskeeper on the SAN’s and cleaned up …
-
“Diskeeper has helped us in a real-world sense. I can point to concrete performance gains in our Citrix environment which resulted in happier users. Furthermore, prior to installing Diskeeper some of our lengthy batch process jobs would often fail at the end of the job with a ‘delayed write fail’ …
-
“I think Diskeeper is great. Our biggest reason for poor performance was machines that were fragmented. Now it does not matter if the users know how to defrag or not, because Diskeeper runs in the background automatically and they don’t even know.”
-
“We found that Diskeeper EnterpriseServer is easier to install and configure than what we were expecting. It runs perfectly on all the servers with absolutely no issues. As far as performance goes, we couldn't be happier. Diskeeper made it so much easier to maintain optimized disks. Prior to installing Diskeeper, …
-
“We run Undelete with InvisiTasking on our file servers which all have VMware ESX. As we use Undelete on two files servers that have been virtualized, we have had it installed both pre and post virtualization and have experienced no difference in the performance of Undelete. The product is an …