We were able to quickly use it to record everything from simple to complex testcases, fine-tune and run them. Components are identified by an Xpath like dialect (RanoreXpath), which is automatically written for you when recording or when using the Ranorex Spy tool.

We evaluated many products searching for an automation tool that would work well with our Silverlight UI. Ranorex won hands down. Ranorex Support has been great. They’ve helped us work through issues with third party controls and with Silverlight complexities. The product gets better with every release.

We found Ranorex as a reliable automated testing tool which easily integrated into any development and testing process. Ranorex helped us to easily create automation scripts which could handle multiple devices, and software applications.

After evaluation of seven (7) UI automation tools to support our flex application we identified Ranorex as the tool that best met our requirements. With Ranorex Premium the identification of the objects, ease of setup and scripting, and overall programming interface exceeded those of the other tools.

Having been in Test Automation for more than a decade, I've seen and used many test automation solutions. I primarily used SilkTest, TestComplete and Perl scripts before. I was surprised when I discovered Ranorex and found its excellent object recognition capabilities and powerful language (C#). We have evaluated several automation tools, incl. AutomatedQA and SilkTest for our current projects at Freeslate. Ranorex was chosen, because it combined power and simplicity of use. Ranorex has superior custom object recognition, which makes it possible to automate even very difficult test cases and scenarios. The ability to load .NET framework libraries, makes the tool beyond reach for most competitors! We used Ranorex to create smoke and functional test suites. After creating function libraries and automating test cases, we found out that the tool could also be used in reproducing defects/automating use cases, which were very hard to do manually.

We have years of experience with different web test automation technologies. Ranorex is the only one that provides a comprehensive suite of tools including an IDE, xpath finder (i.e Spy), a runtime, combined with a high quality test platform with a minimum of false positives. Based on our first 12 months with Ranorex, we have made the choice to consolidate our web test automation on Ranorex.

I have seen many tools for automated tests, Ranorex certainly stands out from this group. It is characterized by a slightly different approach, which brings it into Highend products areas.

Our company needed a “silver bullet” to aid in the automated testing of our wide variety of technologies. As we evaluated Ranorex, it solved so many of the problems we had faced. We needed support for .NET, Adobe FLEX & FLASH, WPF, among others; and we especially liked the power that RanoreXpath gave to use to resolve problems with dynamic components.

We decided on Ranorex based on the technologies it supports, simple integration with .NET using familiar languages like C# and, most importantly, its robust object recognition capabilities (Flex, Flash, ASP.NET and HTML).

I got two other engineers in a war room and we drew straws … Each of us used a different tool – HP QTP, Watir, and Ranorex – to build 7 tests that ran in a minimum of 2 browsers ... Ranorex won hands down. Watir beat Ranorex in one category – ability to launch 4 browsers and run headless with celerity. However, the configuration for that setup is complex and not easily duplicated. The speed of Ranorex over HP QTP is ridiculous. Having C# makes it a no brainer.

Having been in Quality Assurance and Test Automation for more than a decade, I've seen and used many different test automation solutions. Not only is Ranorex's solution one of the most powerful and easy to use, it has one of the lowest cost entry points resulting in a quicker ROI and their end user support and communication has been second to none.

Thanks for the great support. HP could only dream of providing “useful” support like this.

Because Ranorex tests applications from a user’s point of view, it is a better alternative to conventional testing tools. And because it provides increased testing accuracy and ease-of-use, it is an even more appealing tool.

After trying several UI test tools, we were most impressed with the Ranorex suite. The tools allow us to rapidly author and execute tests for our WPF applications. Additionally, the Excel plug-in is a huge win for us, especially since we’ve found no other test products that robustly handle Excel interactions.

I’ve purchased and successfully implemented Ranorex 2.x at 3 different firms. In each case, the end to end acquisition cycle of initial sales contact, proof of concept, technical support and final sale has been nothing but pleasurable. For each installation the service I received was consistently stellar, there were no “hard sell” tactics and each person I interacted with was informed, engaged and interested in seeing me succeed. I haven’t had this kind of tool acquisition experience in years.

In total the test execution times of the test automation projects were significantly improved. In conjunction with a new test case design, ease of use, the functionality of the software and C# as the standard programming language, new test cases can now be implemented more effectively than with the old software. The results up to now indicate that only 60% of the time is needed for execution with Ranorex robust tests compared to the previously used automation tool.