“What we were paying for [our no-code tool] doesn’t capture the true cost when you look at the time and focus it took away from people on the team. And because we had such low coverage, it might have done more harm than good because it would tell us that …

"Some projects were even called “eternal projects.” Developers would move on to other projects before the testers could go over everything. Sometimes features would lay around for four months before they were released. It was making developers really unhappy, and slowing down our business strategy."