42 Pernix Data Testimonials

Industry
Company Size
15 per page
  • 15
Reset
  • “If you need a lot of capacity and high peak performance, FVP is the right solution. You can offload the performance part to a good local SSD and get a high capacity SAN, all at a very competitive price.”

  • “PernixData FVP is a perfect solution for delivering consistent and reliable database and web server performance. It delivers the low latency benefits of server-side flash, without requiring us to spend a fortune on unnecessary hardware.”

  • “To be most accurate, it is important to generate the report at the very last moment before a shift starts. On a physical database, a standard report took 12 minutes to run. When we virtualized our Oracle, we saw this query time increase to almost 30 minutes, primarily due to storage bottlenecks. This was a key trigger for us to look at new solutions for enhancing the performance of our virtual infrastructure.”

  • “After we added some more VMs, everything came to a halt and became very sluggish. We needed to step up and fix the issues with a minimal investment.”

  • “As we started to look at the configuration of our cloud platform, we wanted to ensure that we could pre-empt any latency issues related to storage. In my experience, dealing with storage is a time consuming exercise when having to remediate customer application performance.”

  • “The application performance improvements are like night and day in comparison to before PernixData FVP software was installed, with significantly lower latency and higher IOPS on every VM,”

  • “We no longer see issues with performance. If we witness any demanding virtual machines, we can just add them ‘on the fly’ to the FVP cluster.”

  • "Just as the hypervisor is for a virtual machine, a VM being accelerated using PernixData FVP has no idea it is being accelerated. No guest agents. No VM configuration changes. It just works."

  • "On one hand, I would have had to spend about $100k on my SAN and cross my fingers that it would be enough to solve our latency issues. On the other hand, I could spend about $17k on FVP and get more than enough IOPS to be sure the latency problem was solved. It was a pretty easy discussion with senior management."

  • “We actually had our software vendor reach out to us to ask what we did to make it run so fast.”

  • “This meeting resulted in me running FVP in a test environment. FVP is extremely easy to install and we had no downtime during the process that took no longer than 6 hours to install, configure and start to use. The trial demonstrated good performance even on slow SSDs,”

  • “[Implementing FVP sofware version 2.5] was very easy. It was as simple as the documentation made it.”

  • “We were experiencing latency issues that were resulting in our services arm having to address a customer’s concerns. Once PernixData FVP was implemented, they were ecstatic with the brilliant results, and so were the customers.”

  • “Specifically, we achieved 300 million IOPs from datastores saved, 6.6 TB of bandwidth saved, 400,000 writes accelerated, and a flash hit rate of a whopping 99% for the workloads moved to the PernixData enabled cluster. Due to these improvements and acceleration readings, we can confidently provide our customers with improved user experience in a simpler and cheaper way than before, enabling us to gain an edge on the competition in the agile and ever changing hosting business.”

  • “We observed a steady increase in general compute workloads and an increased appetite from clients to move business critical applications onto cloud, which increased the I/O load on our storage,”