-
"We primarily use Neptune for training monitoring, particularly for loss tracking, which is crucial to decide whether to stop training if it’s not converging properly. It’s also invaluable for comparing experiments and presenting key insights through an intuitive dashboard to our managers and product owners."
-
“The problem with training models on remote clusters is that every time you want to see what is going on, you need to get your FTP client up, download the logs to a machine with a graphical interface, and plot it. I tried using TensorBoard but it was painful to …
-
"I’ve used Neptune from 2019, first for my personal projects and now within the company. During this time, I saw changes and improvements in UI, but also performance and reliability. But at the same time, I always appreciated that it never became too cluttered with too many things. It’s straight …
-
"The killer feature in Neptune is custom dashboards. Without this, I wouldn’t be able to communicate my simulations to Developers, the Analytics team, and business stakeholders without any hassle. Neptune gives our Data Scientists the piece of mind that their best results won’t be lost and that communication will be …
-
"Neptune made sense to us due to its pay-per-use or usage-based pricing. Now when we are doing active experiments then we can scale up and when we’re busy integrating all our models for a few months that we scale down again."
-
"We use Neptune for most of our tracking tasks, from experiment tracking to uploading the artifacts. A very useful part of tracking was monitoring the metrics, now we could easily see and compare those F-scores and other metrics."
-
"For our company, a big plus of Neptune is the availability of a self-hosted version. We were looking for such a solution and found that not many services offer this option at an affordable price. Using the self-hosted version of Neptune is no different from the cloud version for end …
-
"Neptune’s UI is highly configurable, which is way better than MLflow."
-
“I’m working with deep learning (music information processing), previously I was using Tensorboard to track losses and metrics in TensorFlow, but now I switched to PyTorch so I was looking for alternatives and I found Neptune a bit easier to use, I like the fact that I don’t need to …
-
“Such a fast setup! Love it:”
-
“I just had a look at neptune logger after a year and to be honest, I am very impressed with the improvements in UI! Earlier, it was a bit hard to compare experiments with charts. I am excited to try this! I just had a look at neptune logger after …
-
"We’ve got a few teams across different countries and different time zones and prior to Neptune, we were just shipping each other zips of like TensorBoard logs, so being able to see it all in space and it’s all just logged to the central area is really great and has …
-
“Neptune allows us to keep all of our experiments organized in a single space. Being able to see my team’s work results any time I need makes it effortless to track progress and enables easier coordination.”
-
"No more DevOps needed for logging. No more starting VMs just to look at some old logs. No more moving data around to compare TensorBoards."
-
"I used Weights & Biases before Neptune. It’s impressive at the beginning, it works out of the box, and the UI is quite nice. But during the four years I used it, it didn’t improve —they didn’t fully develop the features they were working on. So I appreciate that Neptune …