62 Neptune.ai Testimonials

“Such a fast setup! Love it:”

"At some point, one of my students tried doing the tracking process manually, and he was very frustrated after one project. Any manual change can mess up information organization and how you track it. And if you do not build it well, then you suffer, you need to recode, etc. I think it’s just a waste of time."

“Neptune is making it easy to share results with my teammates. I’m sending them a link and telling what to look at, or I’m building a View on the experiments dashboard. I don’t need to generate it by myself, and everyone in my team have access to it.”

"I really appreciate that I’ve never seen any outage in Neptune. And since we’re training an LLM, that it’s super critical to not have any outages in our loss curve. Other than that, there are things you often take for granted in a product: reliability, flexibility, quality of support. Neptune nails those and gives us the confidence."

"Neptune and Optuna go hand in hand. You should start using Neptune as early as possible to save the trouble of having to go through multiple log statements to make sense of how your model did."

"We are very integrated with AWS and want everything to happen inside of AWS, and when you are training on a large scale, you want multiple training jobs to happen at once, and that is where Neptune comes in."

“Indeed it was a game-changer for me, as you know AI training workloads are lengthy in nature, sometimes also prone to hanging in colab environment, and just to be able to launch a set of tests trying different hyperparameters with the assurance that the experiment will be correctly recorded in terms of results and hyper-parameters was big for me.”

"Our ML teams at Waabi continuously run large-scale experiments with ML models. A significant challenge we faced was keeping track of the data they collected from experiments and exporting it in an organized and shareable way."

"We evaluated several commercial and open-source solutions. We looked at the features for tracking experiments, the ability to share, the quality of the documentation, and the willingness to add new features. Neptune was the best choice for our use cases."

"We tried MLflow. But the problem is that they have no user management features, which messes up a lot of things."

"As our company has grown from a startup to a sizeable organization of 200 people, robust security and effective user management have become increasingly evident and vital."

“I’m working with deep learning (music information processing), previously I was using Tensorboard to track losses and metrics in TensorFlow, but now I switched to PyTorch so I was looking for alternatives and I found Neptune a bit easier to use, I like the fact that I don’t need to (re)start my own server all the time and also the logging of GPU memory etc. is nice. So far I didn’t have the need to share the results with anyone, but I may in the future, so that will be nice as well.”

“Neptune was easy to set up and integrate into my experimental flow. The tracking and logging options are exactly what I needed and the documentation was up to date and well written.”

"Weights and Biases went from being reasonably priced to being way too much. Especially since more than half the people we wanted to be able to see our models weren’t doing modeling. When we looked for an alternative, Neptune was the only one that could offer us everything we needed."

"For our company, a big plus of Neptune is the availability of a self-hosted version. We were looking for such a solution and found that not many services offer this option at an affordable price. Using the self-hosted version of Neptune is no different from the cloud version for end users. However, it has a several of advantages – unlimited storage and isolation from the global network, which increases data security."