“Contractor Foreman is well worth the investment. I like the constant improvements that the developers are always working on. Customer service is very responsive. I have made multiple suggestions to development and have always received a response whether it be for more info or sometimes, what their plan is to implement my suggestion.“
"It is easy for service technicians to take photos and upload them with a description of the work performed. It is also a good system for tracking timecards for employees."
"We've searched for FIVE years and have used most of the bigger names in the construction industry. Most highly overpriced, and poor customer service. CF has great people, all willing to help and they're even modifying the system monthly based on their customer feedback. What? A company that cares what we think?"
“Financial tracking, estimates, invoicing were all done by hand & on paper."
“Contractor Foreman requires the user to follow simple critical steps to achieve a quality result. At any moment we can easily see a project’s profitability.”
“Our old software was clunky, forcing us to jump between purchase orders, subcontracts, and invoices. Plus, securing data was a challenge. Contractor Foreman’s web access and permission controls solved those problems, streamlining workflows and tightening security.”
“As we expanded our operations, the necessity for a streamlined workflow that could keep up with our pace became evident. Our traditional methods were no longer sufficient in managing the complexities of our projects.”
“We wanted to introduce a more systematic approach to daily tasks, together with a more strategic outlook, and it was clear that we needed a better solution to manage our growing operations and ensure we could continue to deliver exceptional service to our clients.”
“We have used multiple platforms, and most of them are not user-friendly."
“I’ve been in the construction industry for a long time, and I’ve used various project management software options, however, they all seemed overly complex or lacked the necessary features for my diverse projects.”
“Searching for documents related to a project was difficult as you had to delve into individual folders and jobs. There were no sitewide searches related to documentation. Customization was limited.”